A Christmas Parable

When growing up, there were very few things that myself, my two half-brothers and two step-sisters agreed on.  One that we did agree on though, was our hatred of going to Grandpa and Grandma L's for Christmas.  It wasn't because it was a long drive to their house, because it wasn't.  It wasn't because we didn't like Grandpa and Grandma L, because we did.  There house was always warm and inviting, as were Grandpa and Grandma L.  No, the reason we dreaded going there was because of our cousin Tracy.

Tracy was an only child and she, along with her mom, had lived with Grandpa and Grandma L.  To say that she was spoiled would be understatement.  And on Christmas day, that special treatment that Tracy received was soul crushing.  I think is why Uncle Dwayne and Uncle Bill always waited to bring their families until later in the evening.

While each of us kids received one or possibly even two gifts from Grandpa and Grandma L, Tracy would receive fifteen and sometimes twenty.  We would be required to sit there and watch as she opened present after present.  Each one more valuable than the next.  This would go on Christmas after Christmas.  In my teen years, my parents tried to shield us from it, but it just didn't work.

It was also during my teen years when realized that my Grandpa L was just as appalled at the extravagance lauded upon Tracy each Christmas as we were.  I know that he tried to stop it each year, but Grandma L and Tracy's mom always thwarted him.

Tracy was the 1%.  Through the virtue of circumstances, she was received more than the rest of grandkids (10 of us), combined.

It is through the virtue of circumstances, that the 1% are able to have more wealth than the 99%, combined.  And they use that accumulated wealth and the desire of their allies, to circumvent any attempts by the 99% to share some of that wealth.

This is why  food stamps (SNAP) faces anywhere from $4 billion in cuts over the next 10 years (the Senate version of the Farm Bill) up to $40 billion in cuts over the next 10 years (the House version of the "split" Farm Bill).  This is why emergency unemployment insurance was not extended before December 28th.  This is why the minimum wage was not increased.  This is why Federal employees and Veterans are seeing their pensions cut by 1% each year.

Unlike all of those Christmases of days past, I have a voice that can and will be used against the 1%.  It is my hope that others will join and make our voices heard in 2014 and each coming year.

Congressional Republicans Are Waging Economic Terrorism

For the many years, Republicans have been waging economic terrorism against the American people.  They have held our nation’s economy hostage time and time again.  Anything that will help the average American they have fought against tooth and nail.  The stimulus, healthcare reform, infrastructure, student loans and food stamps (SNAP), to name just a few areas where Republicans have waged economic terrorism.  Hell, they have even stood in the way of disaster relief after Hurricane Sandy.

Now, Republicans, specifically Republicans in the House of Representatives, are threatening to not increase the “Debt Ceiling”, unless either the Affordable Care Act (Obamacare) is defunded or cuts in Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid greater than what the debt ceiling increase would be.  This is the very definition of economic terrorism.  And what is worse, the American people aren’t the only hostages.  So are the people around the world, because if the United States is even perceived as going to default on our national debt, the economy of the world will tumble in ways we have never seen.

Officially, the United States does not negotiate with terrorists.  As we have seen though, we do negotiate with terrorists.  Does Iran-Contra ring any bells?  And President Obama has been more than willing to negotiate with the economic terrorists known as Congressional Republicans.  He negotiated an end to the so called “fiscal cliff” that gave Republicans, in the words of Speaker of the House John Boehner, 98% percent of what they wanted, including making permanent the Bush Tax Cuts.  President Obama then again negotiated the increase in the debt ceiling by agreeing to the infamous “sequester”.

I wish I had hope that President Obama would change his ways and actually fight for the American people and not negotiate with the economic terrorists.  I really wish he would invoke the “Full Faith and Credit” clause of the 14^th Amendment of the Constitution.  Like so many wishes though, I doubt they will ever be fulfilled.  Sad to say, but I do believe the economic terrorists will win again.

The War on Food Stamps: The Continuation

A little over two years ago, I wrote a post entitled The War on Food Stamps.  It quickly became and still is my most read and commented on post.  Two years have passed and yet the war on food stamps sadly continues unabated.

This past week, a small battle was one in this continuing war on the poor and working poor: The “bipartisan” Farm Bill was defeated in the House of Representatives.  This was an amazing event as farm bills are never defeated because they are loaded with subsidies that primarily favor big agri-businesses such as Archer-Daniels-Midland (ADM).  The bill was defeated because a majority of Democrats (24 voted for it) couldn’t stomach the $2 billion a year in cuts to the food stamps program (along with other provisions that would make it tough for people to quality for food stamps).  It was also defeated because 62 Republicans didn’t think the cuts and restrictions were draconian enough.

But why is this war still being fought?  I mean, we have no problem writing checks directly to farmers and major corporations in the form of price supports and other subsidies.  Why should we begrudge the poor and working poor from eating, which actually helps those very farmers and major agri-businesses?  I honestly cannot fathom why Republicans and 24 Democrats in the House of Representatives (the Senate version of the Farm Bill includes $400 million a year in cuts to food stamps, so they aren’t saints either) feel the need to keep stomping on the necks of those who have so little or nothing at all.

The economy hasn’t changed that much in the two years since I wrote that original post.  Unemployment is still extremely high.  Many of those who do have jobs are either underemployed (barely working part-time) or are working multiple jobs.  Many are still struggling to pay their bills and to put food on the table, if they are able to at all.  And yet, we have members of Congress (and our President) who think that we should be cutting food stamps and making it tougher for people to qualify.

The war on food stamps and the greater war on the poor and working poor in the United States needs to end.  How can we be the greatest nation if we refuse to take care of the least of us?