Showing posts with label campaign finance. Show all posts
Showing posts with label campaign finance. Show all posts

Monday, November 5, 2012

Reform Our Electoral System

Can we all agree that our nation’s electoral system is fucked up?  We have 50 individual states that set their own laws regarding the times, locations and who is eligible to vote resulting in 50 different sets of election laws.  Some of these laws make it easier for people to vote and some of these laws make it tougher for people to exercise their right to vote and these laws change year to year.  Add in that the various electoral subdivisions within each of those 50 states has different methods to cast a vote, plus that elections are overseen by partisan elected officials and you have a recipe for disaster on a grand scale.

If we wish to actually be that shining beacon of democracy that we as a nation claim to be, we need to make some serious changes.  These changes include standardization of eligibility and voting methods, standardization of voting times, creation of a national voting “holiday”, reform of the Electoral College, elimination of partisan elected electoral officials and campaign finance reform.  This is not exhaustive, but it is a good starting point.

STANDARDIZATION OF ELIGIBILITY:  This one should be a no brainer, but there are people in this nation who just don’t want other people to vote.  These “undesirables” include (but are not limited to) African-Americans, Hispanics, the poor, the elderly and those convicted of felonies.  Conservatives (of both parties) are the ones who push for the exclusions while liberals push for their inclusion.  Myself, I think that even those convicted felons serving time should be eligible to vote (they retain other rights, why not their right to vote?).

So, it is my belief that the easiest standardization of eligibility would be this: If you are at 18 years of age or older at time of the election and are a citizen of the United States, then you are eligible to vote.  Period.

STANDARDIZATION OF VOTING METHODS:  After the 2000 elections “hanging chads” fiasco, Congress deemed it wise to send billions of dollars to the states to “update” their voting methods.  There was no requirement for standardization across the nation, let alone within the individual states.  Each voting subdivision was allowed to choose which voting methods they wished to use.  Some chose electronic voting machines, some with printed paper “receipts” and some without.  Some “optical scan” paper ballot systems.

I prefer the optical scan paper ballots myself.  Even if the optical scanner breaks down, you can at least hand count the paper ballots.  With electronic voting machines, if the machine breaks down, there is the strong potential that all of the votes cast on that machine are lost.  Not to mention that these machines have been proven to be easily hacked and that bad software can “flip” votes cast.

So yes, my vote would be to require that all electoral subdivisions use optical scan paper ballots.

STANDARDIZATION OF VOTING TIMES:  We live in a 24 hour society yet in many states, the hours that one can vote on election day are set at times that don’t acknowledge that fact.

To me, the solution is simple: Voting on election day should be from 1:00 am until 11:00 pm in every electoral subdivision.  Couple this with making Election Day a National holiday and we may no longer need “early voting”.

MAKE ELECTION DAY A NATIONAL HOLIDAY:  I remember while watching the History Channel’s mini-series of the Hatfields & McCoys a couple of scenes regarding election day.  This was a day that they got dressed up and the entire family went to the polling location and turned it into a party.  The thought that kept running through my mind was: Why don’t we do that now?

So yes, I believe we should make Election Day a mandatory national holiday.

ELIMINATE PARTISAN ELECTED ELECTIONS OFFICIALS: As we saw in 2000, partisan elected election officials have political motivation to sway an election the way of their party.  We are seeing it again in 2012 with Ohio Secretary of State Jon Husted has become the poster child of what is wrong with partisan elected electoral officials.  A couple of states have countered this by creating non-partisan commissions that oversee elections.  I think the non-partisan commission is the best way to go.  It takes away the incentive to sway an election toward a particular candidate or party.

CAMPAIGN FINANCE REFORM:  It is estimated that $5 billion will be spent during this election cycle for all races combined.  This is an astronomical amount of money.  Other than putting severe limits on how much one can contribute to a campaign, who can contribute and who can receive campaign contributions, I am not sure what can be done.  Plus, without a constitutional amendment, the US Supreme Court’s decision to equate money with speech will contravene any such attempts to reform our campaign finance laws.

In the end, it is up to us to institute reforms and once these reforms are enacted, remain vigilant to see that these reforms are not undone.

Sunday, March 27, 2011

McComish v. Bennett: The Supreme Court Takes On Public Campaign Financing

Tomorrow, the Supreme Court hears arguments in the Arizona public election financing case McComish v. Bennett.  This is the first big campaign financing case since the ludicrous decision in Citizens United.  McComish is the big test to see if the Supreme Court will expand their view that money equals speech or if they will pull back from the precipice and allow reasonable restrictions on campaign financing.

I am not holding out much hope for the continuation of the Arizona Clean Elections law.  I have no doubt that the majority in Citizens United will strike down the Arizona Clean Elections law and hand the Republicans and their allies another victory in regards to campaign financing.  They will expand the terrible concept that money equals speech and that the candidate with more money gets more speech.

Maybe its time to introduce the following amendment to the U.S. Constitution:
No group, association or other private legal entity may contribute to any political campaign, only individual citizens of legal voting age and state governments on an equal basis where public financing of campaigns have been enacted.  The states and federal governments may limit campaign contributions for their respective jurisdictions with equal protection for the contributors and campaigns.
I know.  No such amendment is going to be passed in my lifetime, but it never hurts to throw it out there.